Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review

Publication date

2025-01

Authors

von Glinski, Alexander
Yilmaz, Emre
Godolias, Periklis
Benneker, Lorin
Oner, F. CumhurORCID 0000-0003-0858-8243ISNI 0000000395222644
Kandziora, Frank
Schroeder, Gregory
Schnake, Klaus
Dvorak, Marcel
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Study Design: Broad narrative review. Objectives: To review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care. Methods: A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages. Results: The sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons’ preference. Conclusion: By a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.

Keywords

fixation, ilium, lumbopelvic, pelvic, S2AI, sacropelvic, Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Clinical Neurology

Citation

von Glinski, A, Yilmaz, E, Godolias, P, Benneker, L, Oner, F C, Kandziora, F, Schroeder, G, Schnake, K, Dvorak, M, Rajasekaran, S, El-Sharkawi, M, Vaccaro, A, Bransford, R, Schildhauer, T A & Chapman, J R 2025, 'Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review', Global Spine Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241283726