Improving Transparency and Replication in Bayesian Statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist

Publication date

2017

Authors

Depaoli, Sarah
Van de Schoot, R.ORCID 0000-0001-7736-2091ISNI 0000000393562696

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Bayesian statistical methods are slowly creeping into all fields of science and are becoming ever more popular in applied research. Although it is very attractive to use Bayesian statistics, our personal experience has led us to believe that naively applying Bayesian methods can be dangerous for at least 3 main reasons: the potential influence of priors, misinterpretation of Bayesian features and results, and improper reporting of Bayesian results. To deal with these 3 points of potential danger, we have developed a succinct checklist: the WAMBS-checklist (When to worry and how to Avoid the Misuse of Bayesian Statistics). The purpose of the questionnaire is to describe 10 main points that should be thoroughly checked when applying Bayesian analysis. We provide an account of "when to worry" for each of these issues related to: (a) issues to check before estimating the model, (b) issues to check after estimating the model but before interpreting results,

Keywords

Bayesian checklist, Bayesian estimation, Convergence, Prior, Sensitivity analysis, Taverne, Psychology (miscellaneous)

Citation

Depaoli, S & van de Schoot, R 2017, 'Improving Transparency and Replication in Bayesian Statistics : The WAMBS-Checklist', Psychological Methods, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000065