Renal denervation beyond the bifurcation: The effect of distal ablation placement on safety and blood pressure

Publication date

2017-04-01

Authors

Beeftink, Martine M A
Spiering, WilkoORCID 0000-0002-2493-6407
De Jong, Mark R.
Doevendans, PieterISNI 0000000110574516
Blankestijn, Peter J.ISNI 0000000389858750
Elvan, Arif
Heeg, Jan Evert
Bots, Michiel LORCID 0000-0003-2871-9810ISNI 0000000391893395
Voskuil, MichielISNI 0000000392050007

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Renal denervation may be more effective if performed distal in the renal artery because of smaller distances between the lumen and perivascular nerves. The authors reviewed the angiographic results of 97 patients and compared blood pressure reduction in relation to the location of the denervation. No significant differences in blood pressure reduction or complications were found between patient groups divided according to their spatial distribution of the ablations (proximal to the bifurcation in both arteries, distal to the bifurcation in one artery and distal in the other artery, or distal to the bifurcation in both arteries), but systolic ambulatory blood pressure reduction was significantly related to the number of distal ablations. No differences in adverse events were observed. In conclusion, we found no reason to believe that renal denervation distal to the bifurcation poses additional risks over the currently advised approach of proximal denervation, but improved efficacy remains to be conclusively established.

Keywords

hypertension—general, optimized treatment, renal denervation, Taverne, Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal Article

Citation

Beeftink, M M A, Spiering, W, De Jong, M R, Doevendans, P A, Blankestijn, P J, Elvan, A, Heeg, J E, Bots, M L & Voskuil, M 2017, 'Renal denervation beyond the bifurcation : The effect of distal ablation placement on safety and blood pressure', Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12989