Webinar of paper 2013, Which method predicts recidivism best? A comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models

Publication date

2013

Authors

Tollenaar, N.
van der Heijden, P.G.M.ISNI 0000000067738801

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Using criminal population criminal conviction history information, prediction models are developed that predict three types of criminal recidivism: general recidivism, violent recidivism and sexual recidivism. The research question is whether prediction techniques from modern statistics, data mining and machine learning provide an improvement in predictive performance over classical statistical methods, namely logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis. These models are compared on a large selection of performance measures. Results indicate that classical methods do equally well as or better than their modern counterparts. The predictive performance of the different techniques differs only slightly for general and violent recidivism, while differences are larger for sexual recidivism. For the general and violent recidivism data we present the results of logistic regression and for sexual recdivisim of linear discriminant analysis.

Keywords

recidivism, prediction, predictive performance, logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, machine learning, data mining, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

Tollenaar, N & Van der Heijden, P G M 2013, 'Webinar of paper 2013, Which method predicts recidivism best? A comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, vol. 176, pp. 565-584. < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6hVYgZmfuk >