Efficacy of Treatment of Non-hereditary Angioedema

Publication date

2018-06

Authors

Van Den Elzen, M. T.
Go, M. F C L
Knulst, AndréISNI 0000000394647122
Blankestijn, M.A.ORCID 0000-0003-4163-0685
van Os-Medendorp, H.ISNI 000000039585617X
Otten, Henny GORCID 0000-0002-6927-2683ISNI 0000000390788817

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Non-hereditary angioedema (AE) with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) can be presumably bradykinin- or mast cell-mediated, or of unknown cause. In this systematic review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to provide an overview of the efficacy of different treatment options for the abovementioned subtypes of refractory non-hereditary AE with or without wheals and with normal C1INH. After study selection and risk of bias assessment, 61 articles were included for data extraction and analysis. Therapies were described for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced AE (ACEi-AE), for idiopathic AE, and for AE with wheals. Described treatments consisted of ecallantide, icatibant, C1INH, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), tranexamic acid (TA), and omalizumab. Additionally, individual studies for anti-vitamin K, progestin, and methotrexate were found. Safety information was available in 26 articles. Most therapies were used off-label and in few patients. There is a need for additional studies with a high level of evidence. In conclusion, in acute attacks of ACEi-AE and idiopathic AE, treatment with icatibant, C1INH, TA, and FFP often leads to symptom relief within 2 h, with limited side effects. For prophylactic treatment of idiopathic AE and AE with wheals, omalizumab, TA, and C1INH were effective and safe in the majority of patients.

Keywords

Angioedema, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, Idiopathic, Treatment, Wheals, Immunology and Allergy

Citation

van den Elzen, M, Go, M F C L, Knulst, A C, Blankestijn, M A, van Os-Medendorp, H & Otten, H G 2018, 'Efficacy of Treatment of Non-hereditary Angioedema', Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-016-8585-0