Change in glycaemic control with structured diabetes self-management education in urban low-resource settings: multicentre randomised trial of effectiveness
Publication date
2023-02-24
Authors
Lamptey, Roberta
Amoakoh-Coleman, Mary
Barker, Mary Moffett
Iddi, Samuel
Hadjiconstantinou, Michelle
Davies, Melanie
Darko, Daniel
Agyepong, Irene
Acheampong, Franklyn
Commey, Mary
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Background: In high-resource settings, structured diabetes self-management education is associated with improved outcomes but the evidence from low-resource settings is limited and inconclusive. Aim: To compare, structured diabetes self-management education to usual care, in adults with type 2 diabetes, in low-resource settings. Research design and methods. Design: Single-blind randomised parallel comparator controlled multi-centre trial. Adults (> 18 years) with type 2 diabetes from two hospitals in urban Ghana were randomised 1:1 to usual care only, or usual care plus a structured diabetes self-management education program. Randomisation codes were computer-generated, and allotment concealed in opaque numbered envelopes. The intervention effect was assessed with linear mixed models. Main outcome: Change in HbA1c after 3-month follow-up. Primary analysis involved all participants. Clinicaltrial.gov identifier:NCT04780425, retrospectively registered on 03/03/2021. Results: Recruitment: 22 nd until 29 th January 2021. We randomised 206 participants (69% female, median age 58 years [IQR: 49–64], baseline HbA1c median 64 mmol/mol [IQR: 45–88 mmol/mol],7.9%[IQR: 6.4–10.2]). Primary outcome data was available for 79 and 80 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Reasons for loss to follow-up were death (n = 1), stroke(n = 1) and unreachable or unavailable (n = 47). A reduction in HbA1c was found in both groups; -9 mmol/mol [95% CI: -13 to -5 mmol/mol], -0·9% [95% CI: -1·2% to -0·51%] in the intervention group and -3 mmol/mol [95% CI -6 to 1 mmol/mol], -0·3% [95% CI: -0·6% to 0.0%] in the control group. The intervention effect was 1 mmol/mol [95%CI:-5 TO 8 p = 0.726]; 0.1% [95% CI: -0.5, 0.7], p = 0·724], adjusted for site, age, and duration of diabetes. No significant harms were observed. Conclusion: In low-resource settings, diabetes self-management education might not be associated with glycaemic control. Clinician’s expectations from diabetes self-management education must therefore be guarded.
Keywords
DSME, Diabetes, HbA1c, Low-resource, Self-care, Health Policy
Citation
Lamptey, R, Amoakoh-Coleman, M, Barker, M M, Iddi, S, Hadjiconstantinou, M, Davies, M, Darko, D, Agyepong, I, Acheampong, F, Commey, M, Yawson, A, Grobbee, D E, Adjei, G O & Klipstein-Grobusch, K 2023, 'Change in glycaemic control with structured diabetes self-management education in urban low-resource settings : multicentre randomised trial of effectiveness', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 23, no. 1, 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09188-y