The Impact of the Choice of Data Source in Record Linkage Studies Estimating Mortality in Venous Thromboembolism

Publication date

2016

Authors

Gallagher, Arlene Marie
Williams, Tim
Leufkens, H.G.ISNI 0000000392454327
De Vries, F.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-8319ISNI 0000000393640594

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Linked electronic healthcare databases are increasingly being used in observational research. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the choice of data source in estimating mortality following VTE, with a secondary aim to investigate the influence of the denominator definition. We used the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to identify patients aged 18+ with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Multiple cohorts were identified in order to assess how mortality rates differed with a range of data sources. For each of the cohorts, incidence rates per 1,000 person years (/1000py) and relative rates (RRs) of all-cause mortality were calculated. The lowest mortality rate was found when only primary care data were used for both the exposure (VTE) and the outcome (death) (108.4/1000py). The highest mortality rate was found for patients diagnosed in secondary care (237.2/1000py). When linked primary and secondary care data were included for eligible patients and for the overlapping period of data collection, a mortality rate of 173.2/1000py was found. Sensitivity analyses varying the denominator definition provided a range of results (140.6-164.3/1000py). The relative rates of mortality by gender and age were comparable across all cohorts. Depending on the choice of data source, the population studied may be different. This may have substantial impact on the main findings, in particular on incidence rates of mortality following VTE.

Keywords

Citation

Gallagher, A M, Williams, T, Leufkens, H G M & de Vries, F 2016, 'The Impact of the Choice of Data Source in Record Linkage Studies Estimating Mortality in Venous Thromboembolism', PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, e0148349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148349