Hepatic bile acid synthesis and secretion: comparison of in vitro methods

Publication date

2022-07-15

Authors

de Bruijn, Véronique M P
Wang, ZhenguoISNI 0000000512658747
Bakker, Wouter
Zheng, Weijia
Spee, BartORCID 0000-0002-8114-0560ISNI 0000000395759855
Bouwmeester, Hans

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Reliable hepatic in vitro systems are crucial for the safety assessment of xenobiotics. Certain xenobiotics decrease the hepatic bile efflux, which can ultimately result in cholestasis. Preclinical animal models and the currently available in vitro systems poorly predict a xenobiotic's cholestatic potential. Here, we compared the phenotype and capacity of three liver derived in vitro systems to emulate human functionality to synthesize and secrete bile acids (BAs). To this end, basal BA production of sandwich cultured human hepatocytes (SCHHs), HepaRG cells (HepaRGs) and hepatocyte-like intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICO-heps) were analysed, and the effect of the known BSEP (Bile Salt Export Pump)-inhibitors bosentan and lopinavir on BA disposition in SCHHs and HepaRGs was quantified. RT-qPCR of selected target genes involved in maturation status, synthesis, transport and conjugation of BAs was performed to mechanistically underpin the observed differences in BA homeostasis. ICO-heps produced a (very) low amount of BAs. SCHHs are a powerful tool in cholestasis-testing due to their high basal BA production and high transporter expression compared to the other models tested. HepaRGs were responsive to both selected BSEP-inhibitors and produced a BA profile that is most similar to the human in vivo situation, making them a suitable and practical candidate for cholestasis-testing.

Keywords

Bile acids and salts, Cholestasis, New approach methodologies

Citation

de Bruijn, V M P, Wang, Z, Bakker, W, Zheng, W, Spee, B & Bouwmeester, H 2022, 'Hepatic bile acid synthesis and secretion : comparison of in vitro methods', Toxicology Letters, vol. 365, pp. 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.06.004