In Silico Screening of Drugs That Target Different Forms of E Protein for Potential Treatment of COVID-19
Publication date
2023-02-14
Authors
Ramírez Salinas, Gema Lizbeth
Rincon, Alejandro Lopez
García Machorro, Jazmín
Correa Basurto, José
Martínez Archundia, Marlet
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Recently the E protein of SARS-CoV-2 has become a very important target in the potential treatment of COVID-19 since it is known to regulate different stages of the viral cycle. There is biochemical evidence that E protein exists in two forms, as monomer and homopentamer. An in silico screening analysis was carried out employing 5852 ligands (from Zinc databases), and performing an ADMET analysis, remaining a set of 2155 compounds. Furthermore, docking analysis was performed on specific sites and different forms of the E protein. From this study we could identify that the following ligands showed the highest binding affinity: nilotinib, dutasteride, irinotecan, saquinavir and alectinib. We carried out some molecular dynamics simulations and free energy MM-PBSA calculations of the protein-ligand complexes (with the mentioned ligands). Of worthy interest is that saquinavir, nilotinib and alectinib are also considered as a promising multitarget ligand because it seems to inhibit three targets, which play an important role in the viral cycle. On the other side, saquinavir was shown to be able to bind to E protein both in its monomeric as well as pentameric forms. Finally, further experimental assays are needed to probe our hypothesis derived from in silico studies.
Keywords
COVID-19, E protein, SARS-CoV-2, drug repositioning, in silico studies, Drug Discovery, Molecular Medicine, Pharmaceutical Science
Citation
Ramírez Salinas, G L, López Rincón, A, García Machorro, J, Correa Basurto, J & Martínez Archundia, M 2023, 'In Silico Screening of Drugs That Target Different Forms of E Protein for Potential Treatment of COVID-19', Pharmaceuticals, vol. 16, no. 2, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16020296