A vertical propeller eddy-covariance method and its application to long-term monitoring of surface turbulent fluxes on the Greenland Ice Sheet

Publication date

2020-09

Authors

Tiggelen, Maurice VanORCID 0000-0001-7898-3359ISNI 0000000492958338
Smeets, PaulISNI 0000000390012963
Reijmer, C.H.ORCID 0000-0001-8299-3883ISNI 0000000392002072
van den Broeke, MichielORCID 0000-0003-4662-7565ISNI 0000000389564445

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

On the Greenland ice sheet, the sensible heat flux is the second largest source of energy for surface melt. Yet in atmospheric models, the surface turbulent heat fluxes are always indirectly estimated using a bulk turbulence parametrization, which needs to be constrained bylong-termandcontinuousobservations.Unfortunately,suchobservationsarechallenging to obtain in remote polar environments, especially over ablating ice surfaces. We therefore test a classical eddy-covariance method, based on propeller anemometers and thermocouple measurements, to estimate the momentum and sensible heat fluxes on the Greenland ice sheet. To correct for the high-frequency attenuation, we experimentally derive the sensor frequency-response characteristics and evaluate the universal turbulence spectra on the ice sheet. We show that the corrected fluxes are accurate and that the sampling interval can be reduced to 4s to increase the system’s autonomy. To illustrate its potential, we apply the correction to one year of vertical propeller eddy-covariance measurements in the western ablation area of the ice sheet, and quantify the seasonal variability of the sensible heat flux and of the aerodynamic roughness length.

Keywords

Eddy covariance, Greenland ice sheet, Melt, Roughness, Sensible heat flux

Citation

Van Tiggelen, M, Smeets, P C J P, Reijmer, C H & Van Den Broeke, M R 2020, 'A vertical propeller eddy-covariance method and its application to long-term monitoring of surface turbulent fluxes on the Greenland Ice Sheet', Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00536-7