The evolution of trauma care in the Netherlands over 20 years

Publication date

2020-04-01

Authors

Hietbrink, FalcoISNI 0000000388513355
Houwert, R MISNI 0000000389377375
van Wessem, K J PORCID 0000-0002-1166-0990ISNI 0000000393699019
Simmermacher, R K JISNI 0000000387827133
Govaert, Geertje A.M.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-1835
de Jong, MB
de Bruin, Ivar G.J.
de Graaf, Johan
Leenen, Luke P HORCID 0000-0001-8385-1801ISNI 0000000390070047

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Introduction: In 1999 an inclusive trauma system was initiated in the Netherlands and a nationwide trauma registry, including all admitted trauma patients to every hospital, was started. The Dutch trauma system is run by trauma surgeons who treat both the truncal (visceral) and extremity injuries (fractures). Materials and Methods: In this comprehensive review based on previous published studies, data over the past 20 years from the central region of the Netherlands (Utrecht) was evaluated. Results: It is demonstrated that the initiation of the trauma systems and the governance by the trauma surgeons led to a region-wide mortality reduction of 50% and a mortality reduction for the most severely injured of 75% in the level 1 trauma centre. Furthermore, major improvements were found in terms of efficiency, demonstrating the quality of the current system and its constructs such as the type of surgeon. Due to the major reduction in mortality over the past few years, the emphasis of trauma care evaluation shifts towards functional outcome of severely injured patients. For the upcoming years, centralisation of severely injured patients should also aim at the balance between skills in primary resuscitation and surgical stabilization versus longitudinal surgical involvement. Conclusion: Further centralisation to a limited number of level 1 trauma centres in the Netherlands is necessary to consolidate experience and knowledge for the trauma surgeon. The future trauma surgeon, as specialist for injured patients, should be able to provide the vast majority of trauma care in this system. For the remaining part, intramural, regional and national collaboration is essential

Keywords

Centralisation, Mortality, Outcome analysis, Trauma systems, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Citation

Hietbrink, F, Houwert, R M, van Wessem, K J P, Simmermacher, R K J, Govaert, G A M, de Jong, M B, de Bruin, I G J, de Graaf, J & Leenen, L P H 2020, 'The evolution of trauma care in the Netherlands over 20 years', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 329-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01273-4