Patient Education and Communication in Palliative Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review

Publication date

2025-10

Authors

Galietta, Erika
Donati, Costanza M.
Mammini, Filippo
Zamfir, Arina A.
Bazzocchi, Alberto
Sassi, Rebecca
Hovenier, Renée
Bos, ClemensORCID 0000-0002-9246-3242ISNI 0000000388845122
Buwenge, Milly
Cammelli, Silvia

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is central to symptom control in advanced cancer, yet referrals are often late, and patients and clinicians frequently hold misconceptions about intent, benefits, and logistics. Patient education may address these gaps, but the PRT-specific evidence base has not been consolidated. We conducted a narrative review following SANRA guidance. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for English-language studies from 1 January 2000 to 18 July 2025. Eligible articles evaluated structured patient-education interventions or characterized education or communication content, information needs, or decision processes among adults referred to or receiving PRT. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Owing to heterogeneity of designs and endpoints, we performed a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis. Six studies met criteria: two randomized controlled trials, two prospective pre–post studies, one qualitative interview study, and one observational communication study, conducted in the Netherlands, the United States, Canada, and Hong Kong. Education at referral or consultation improved knowledge, reduced decisional uncertainty, and increased readiness to proceed with PRT. Education integrated with treatment improved symptom outcomes, including higher rates of pain control at 12 weeks and faster time to pain control when a nurse-led pain-education program accompanied PRT for painful bone metastases, and improvements in dyspnea, fatigue, anxiety, and function in advanced lung cancer. Observational and qualitative work showed low patient question-asking and persistent curative expectations; overall quality of life generally did not change. Although the evidence is limited and heterogeneous, targeted, standardized education appears to improve decision quality and selected symptoms in PRT pathways. Pragmatic multi-site trials and implementation studies are needed to define content, timing, personnel, and delivery models that are scalable in routine care.

Keywords

advanced cancer, bone metastases, communication, decision aids, narrative review, pain education, palliative radiotherapy, patient education, shared decision-making, symptom management, Oncology, Cancer Research

Citation

Galietta, E, Donati, C M, Mammini, F, Zamfir, A A, Bazzocchi, A, Sassi, R, Hovenier, R, Bos, C, Buwenge, M, Cammelli, S, Verkooijen, H M & Morganti, A G 2025, 'Patient Education and Communication in Palliative Radiotherapy : A Narrative Review', Cancers, vol. 17, no. 19, 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193109