Mitapivat versus Placebo for Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
Publication date
2022-04-14
Authors
Al-Samkari, Hanny
Galactéros, Frédéric
Glenthøj, Andreas
Rothman, Jennifer A.
Andres, Oliver
Grace, Rachael F.
Morado-Arias, Marta
Layton, D. Mark
Onodera, Koichi
Verhovsek, Madeleine
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyruvate kinase deficiency is a rare, hereditary, chronic condition that is associated with hemolytic anemia. In a phase 2 study, mitapivat, an oral, first-in-class activator of erythrocyte pyruvate kinase, increased the hemoglobin level in patients with pyruvate kinase deficiency. METHODS In this global, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency who were not receiving regular red-cell transfusions. The patients were assigned to receive either mitapivat (5 mg twice daily, with potential escalation to 20 or 50 mg twice daily) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a hemoglobin response (an increase from baseline of ≥1.5 g per deciliter in the hemoglobin level) that was sustained at two or more scheduled assessments at weeks 16, 20, and 24. Secondary efficacy end points were the average change from baseline in the hemoglobin level, markers of hemolysis and hematopoiesis, and the change from baseline at week 24 in two pyruvate kinase deficiency-specific patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS Sixteen of the 40 patients (40%) in the mitapivat group had a hemoglobin response, as compared with none of the 40 patients in the placebo group (adjusted difference, 39.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 24.1 to 54.6; two-sided P<0.001). Patients who received mitapivat had a greater response than those who received placebo with respect to each secondary end point, including the average change from baseline in the hemoglobin level. The most common adverse events were nausea (in 7 patients [18%] in the mitapivat group and 9 patients [23%] in the placebo group) and headache (in 6 patients [15%] and 13 patients [33%], respectively). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10 patients (25%) who received mitapivat and 5 patients (13%) who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS In patients with pyruvate kinase deficiency, mitapivat significantly increased the hemoglobin level, decreased hemolysis, and improved patient-reported outcomes. No new safety signals were identified in the patients who received mitapivat.
Keywords
Adult, Anemia, Hemolytic, Congenital Nonspherocytic/drug therapy, Double-Blind Method, Hemoglobins/analysis, Hemolysis/drug effects, Humans, Piperazines/pharmacology, Pyruvate Kinase/deficiency, Pyruvate Metabolism, Inborn Errors/drug therapy, Quinolines/pharmacology, Taverne, General Medicine, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article
Citation
Al-Samkari, H, Galactéros, F, Glenthøj, A, Rothman, J A, Andres, O, Grace, R F, Morado-Arias, M, Layton, D M, Onodera, K, Verhovsek, M, Barcellini, W, Chonat, S, Judge, M P, Zagadailov, E, Xu, R, Hawkins, P, Beynon, V, Gheuens, S, van Beers, E J & the ACTIVATE Investigators 2022, 'Mitapivat versus Placebo for Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 386, no. 15, pp. 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116634