Reasoning about group responsibility for exceeding risk threshold in one-shot games
Publication date
2025-03
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Tracing and analysing the responsibility for unsafe outcomes of actors' decisions in multi-agent settings have been studied in recent years. These studies often focus on deterministic scenarios and assume that the unsafe outcomes for which actors can be held responsible are actually realized. This paper considers a broader notion of responsibility where unsafe outcomes are not necessarily realized, but their probabilities are unacceptably high. We present a logic combining strategic, probabilistic and temporal primitives designed to express concepts such as the risk of an undesirable outcome and being responsible for exceeding a risk threshold in one-shot games. We demonstrate that the proposed logic is (weakly) complete, decidable and has an efficient model-checking procedure. Finally, we define a probabilistic notion of responsibility and study its formal properties in the proposed logic setting.
Keywords
Coalition logic, Probabilistic logic, Reasoning about risk, Responsibility, Theoretical Computer Science, Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Computational Theory and Mathematics
Citation
Gladyshev, M, Alechina, N, Dastani, M & Doder, D 2025, 'Reasoning about group responsibility for exceeding risk threshold in one-shot games', Information and Computation, vol. 303, 105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2024.105257