Evidence and Consensus-Based Imaging Guidelines in Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy (APMPPE) - Multimodal imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 7

Publication date

2025-10

Authors

Carreño, Ester
Maghsoudlou, Panayiotis
Fonollosa, Alejandro
Leal, Inês
Schlaen, Ariel
Abraham, Alan Roy
Dick, Andrew D
Agarwal, Aniruddha
Gangaputra, Sapna
Invernizzi, Alessandro

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop consensus-based guidelines on use and interpretation of multimodal imaging in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE). DESIGN: Consensus agreement led by literature, and an expert committee using a nominal group technique (NGT). METHODS: The expert committee for APMPPE performed a thorough review of representative cases of APMPPE. The cases were used to develop guidelines for the diagnosis and follow-up of APMPPE using color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and OCT angiography (OCTA). Structured NGT-based discussions were used to achieve consensus-based recommendations on imaging characteristics, disease activity, and complications, and subsequently were adopted by a vote of the entire taskforce. RESULTS: Diagnosis of active APMPPE is characterized by distinctive imaging findings on CFP, and hyper-reflectivity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ), external limiting membrane (ELM), and outer nuclear layer (ONL) on OCT. Choriocapillaris non-perfusion, detectable via early-phase FFA, ICGA or OCTA, is crucial. In the early stages of APMPPE, OCT findings may be unremarkable, making FFA, ICGA, and/or OCTA relevant for the diagnosis. Based on the imaging findings, APMPPE can be classified into 4 stages of activity: choroidal, chorioretinal, transitional, and resolved. Following diagnosis, OCT and OCTA can be used to monitor lesion activity and identify potential complications. CONCLUSIONS: MUV imaging criteria enable the identification of key diagnostic features for APMPPE, extending the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification. These consensus-based guidelines provide a framework for evaluating disease activity and complications, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and guiding clinical management.

Keywords

Acute Disease, Coloring Agents/administration & dosage, Consensus, Fluorescein Angiography/methods, Humans, Indocyanine Green/administration & dosage, Multimodal Imaging/standards, Retinal Diseases/diagnosis, Retinal Pigment Epithelium/pathology, Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods, Uveitis/diagnosis, Consensus Development Conference, Journal Article, Practice Guideline

Citation

Carreño, E, Maghsoudlou, P, Fonollosa, A, Leal, I, Schlaen, A, Abraham, A R, Dick, A D, Agarwal, A, Gangaputra, S, Invernizzi, A, Fawzi, A, Miserocchi, E, Agrawal, R, Jabs, D A, Sarraf, D, Gupta, V & Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce 2025, 'Evidence and Consensus-Based Imaging Guidelines in Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy (APMPPE) - Multimodal imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 7', American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 278, pp. 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.007