Moving Away from Open Judicial Balancing Review: The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach as Illustrated by Its Case Law Relevant to the Covid-19 Pandemic

Publication date

2023-07

Authors

Gerards, JannekeORCID 0000-0003-3490-2232ISNI 0000000018898905

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic truly has been called a global crisis. To fight the spread of the virus, many States have introduced measures that seriously restrict or affect fundamental rights, ranging from procedural rights to the freedom of movement and the right to personal autonomy. In Europe, it is to be expected that many cases concerning such rights infringements eventually will come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This contribution aims to give an insight into how the Court will likely give shape to its proportionality test in such cases. It thereby predicts that open balancing review – for which the ECtHR is famous – will play a much less important role than methods of reasoning by analogy and procedural review.

Keywords

Argumentation, Balancing, Covid-19, ECtHR, Ec hr, Fundamental rights, Judicial, Proportionality

Citation

Gerards, J 2023, 'Moving Away from Open Judicial Balancing Review : The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach as Illustrated by Its Case Law Relevant to the Covid-19 Pandemic', The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10096