Faces Merely Labelled as Artificial are Trusted Less

Publication date

2022-06-10

Authors

Liefooghe, BaptistISNI 0000000352730673
Oliveira, M.ORCID 0000-0002-6220-0695ISNI 0000000512506364
Leisten, Luca
Hoogers, E.
Aarts, H.ISNI 0000000369416605
Hortensius, RuudORCID 0000-0002-5279-6202ISNI 0000000419557589

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/workingpaper/preprint
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Artificial intelligence plays a crucial role on our daily lives. At the same time, artificial intelligence is often met with reluctance and distrust. Previous research demonstrated that faces that are visibly artificial are considered to be less trustworthy and remembered less accurately compared to natural faces. Current technology, however, enables the generation of artificial faces that are indistinguishable from natural faces. Accordingly, we tested whether natural faces that are merely labelled to be artificial are also trusted less. In three experiments (N = 399), we observed that natural faces merely labeled as being artificial were judged to be less trustworthy. This bias was robust and did not depend on the degree of trustworthiness and attractiveness of the faces, nor could it be modulated by changing raters’ attitude towards artificial intelligence. At the same time, we did not observe differences in recall performance. We conclude that understanding and changing social evaluations towards artificial intelligence goes beyond eliminating physical differences between artificial and natural entities.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, trust, face perception, outgroup effects, socialpsychology

Citation

Liefooghe, B, Oliveira, M, Leisten, L M, Hoogers, E, Aarts, H & Hortensius, R 2022 'Faces Merely Labelled as Artificial are Trusted Less' PsyArXiv, pp. 1-32. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/te2ju