A comparative study of mirror self-recognition in three corvid species
Publication date
2023-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Mirror self-recognition (MSR) assessed by the Mark Test has been the staple test for the study of animal self-awareness. When tested in this paradigm, corvid species return discrepant results, with only the Eurasian magpies and the Indian house crow successfully passing the test so far, whereas multiple other corvid species fail. The lack of replicability of these positive results and the large divergence in applied methodologies calls into question whether the observed differences are in fact phylogenetic or methodological, and, if so, which factors facilitate the expression of MSR in some corvids. In this study, we (1) present new results on the self-recognition abilities of common ravens, (2) replicate results of azure-winged magpies, and (3) compare the mirror responses and performances in the mark test of these two corvid species with a third corvid species: carrion crows, previously tested following the same experimental procedure. Our results show interspecies differences in the approach of and the response to the mirror during the mirror exposure phase of the experiment as well as in the subsequent mark test. However, the performances of these species in the Mark Test do not provide any evidence for their ability of self-recognition. Our results add to the ongoing discussion about the convergent evolution of MSR and we advocate for consistent methodologies and procedures in comparing this ability across species to advance this discussion.
Keywords
Azure-winged magpies, Carrion crow, Common raven, Mirror response, Mirror-mark test, Self-awareness, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citation
Vanhooland, L-C, Szabó, A, Bugnyar, T & Massen, J J M 2023, 'A comparative study of mirror self-recognition in three corvid species', Animal Cognition, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-022-01696-4