Safety information on QT-interval prolongation: comparison of European Union and United States drug labeling

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , 1_s2.0_S1359644614002517_main.pdf (276.88 KB)

Publication date

2014-09

Authors

Warnier, M.J.ISNI 0000000419444015
Holtkamp, Frank A.
Rutten, Frans H.
Hoes, Arno W.
De Boer, AnthoniusISNI 0000000389596105
Mol, Peter G M
De Bruin, MariekeORCID 0000-0001-9197-7068ISNI 0000000397182332

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

Prolongation of the QT interval can predispose to fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Differences in QT-labeling language can result in miscommunication and suboptimal risk mitigation. We systematically compared the phraseology used to communicate on QT-prolonging properties of 144 drugs newly approved (1st January 2006 to 1st June 2012) in the European Union (EU) and the United States (US), of which 66 mentioned the term 'QT' (two EU only, 28 US only, 36 both). The agreement between authorities about the message on QT prolongation (does not prolong, unclear, possibly prolongs, prolongs) was moderate (kappa 0.434). However, the agreement in expected clinical decisions based on the product labels was much higher (kappa 0.673). The US drug label tends to be more explicit, especially when it considers absence of QT effects. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Pharmacology, Drug Discovery

Citation

Warnier, M J, Holtkamp, F A, Rutten, F H, Hoes, A W, de Boer, A, Mol, P G M & De Bruin, M L 2014, 'Safety information on QT-interval prolongation : comparison of European Union and United States drug labeling', Drug Discovery Today, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1294-1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.06.017