When Bi-Interpretability Implies Synonymy

Abstract

Two salient notions of sameness of theories are synonymy, aka definitional equivalence, and bi-interpretability. Of these two definitional equivalence is the strictest notion. In which cases can we infer synonymy from bi-interpretability? We study this question for the case of sequential theories. Our result is as follows. Suppose that two sequential theories are biinterpretable and that the interpretations involved in the bi-interpretation are one-dimensional and identity preserving. Then, the theories are synonymous. The crucial ingredient of our proof is a version of the Schr¨oder-Bernstein theorem under very weak conditions. We think this last result has some independent interest. We provide an example to show that this result is optimal. There are two finitely axiomatized sequential theories that are bi-interpretable but not synonymous, where precisely one of the interpretations involved in the biinterpretation is not identity preserving.