High-volume online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis: a short review of recent evidence and a discussion on clinical implementation
Publication date
2025-11
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Abstract
Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has received significant attention as a potentially superior dialysis modality compared to conventional high-flux hemodialysis for patients with end-stage kidney disease. The CONVINCE (CONvective VERSus diffusive dialysis in patients with End-stage kidney disease) trial, subsequent meta-analyses, and observational studies indicate that high-dose HDF (≥23 L convection per session) is associated with improved survival outcomes, particularly through reductions in cardiovascular and possibly also infection-related mortality. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests modest but meaningful benefits in health-related quality of life and symptom control. This comment synthesizes the current literature (2022-2025), highlighting clinical outcomes, patient-centered metrics, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, personalized treatment considerations, and implications for clinical practice. Additionally, practical prescription guidance is provided to assist nephrologists in achieving optimal convection volumes and clinical outcomes in routine clinical practice.
Keywords
Clinical trial, Hemodiafiltration, Hemodialysis, Mortality, Nephrology, Urology, Journal Article
Citation
Blankestijn, P J 2025, 'High-volume online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis : a short review of recent evidence and a discussion on clinical implementation', Kidney research and clinical practice, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 875-879. https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.25.179