Human Fear Chemosignaling: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Publication date

2017

Authors

de Groot, Jasper H BISNI 0000000493258261
Smeets, Monique A.M.ISNI 0000000395568223

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Alarm pheromones are widely used in the animal kingdom. Notably, there are 26 published studies (N = 1652) highlighting a human capacity to communicate fear, stress, and anxiety via body odor from one person (66% males) to another (69% females). The question is whether the findings of this literature reflect a true effect, and what the average effect size is. These questions were answered by combining traditional meta-analysis with novel meta-analytical tools, p-curve analysis and p-uniform-techniques that could indicate whether findings are likely to reflect a true effect based on the distribution of P-values. A traditional random-effects meta-analysis yielded a small-to-moderate effect size (Hedges' g: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.31-0.41), p-curve analysis showed evidence diagnostic of a true effect (ps < 0.0001), and there was no evidence for publication bias. This meta-analysis did not assess the internal validity of the current studies; yet, the combined results illustrate the statistical robustness of a field in human olfaction dealing with the human capacity to communicate certain emotions (fear, stress, anxiety) via body odor.

Keywords

Taverne, General Neuroscience

Citation

de Groot, J H B & Smeets, M A M 2017, 'Human Fear Chemosignaling : Evidence from a Meta-Analysis', Chemical Senses, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 663-673. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx049