The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department: a multi-centre derivation and validation study

Publication date

2019-02-08

Authors

Saeed, Kordo
Wilson, Darius Cameron
Bloos, Frank
Schuetz, Philipp
van der Does, Yuri
Melander, Olle
Hausfater, Pierre
Legramante, Jacopo M
Claessens, Yann-Erick
Amin, Deveendra

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of validated tools to assess potential disease progression and hospitalisation decisions in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection. This study aimed to identify suitable blood biomarkers (MR-proADM, PCT, lactate and CRP) or clinical scores (SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, NEWS and CRB-65) to fulfil this unmet clinical need. Methods: An observational derivation patient cohort validated by an independent secondary analysis across nine EDs. Logistic and Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess performance. Disease progression was identified using a composite endpoint of 28-day mortality, ICU admission and hospitalisation > 10 days. Results: One thousand one hundred seventy-five derivation and 896 validation patients were analysed with respective 28-day mortality rates of 7.1% and 5.0%, and hospitalisation rates of 77.9% and 76.2%. MR-proADM showed greatest accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and hospitalisation requirement across both cohorts. Patient subgroups with high MR-proADM concentrations (≥ 1.54 nmol/L) and low biomarker (PCT < 0.25 ng/mL, lactate < 2.0 mmol/L or CRP < 67 mg/L) or clinical score (SOFA < 2 points, qSOFA < 2 points, NEWS < 4 points or CRB-65 < 2 points) values were characterised by a significantly longer length of hospitalisation (p < 0.001), rate of ICU admission (p < 0.001), elevated mortality risk (e.g. SOFA, qSOFA and NEWS HR [95%CI], 45.5 [10.0-207.6], 23.4 [11.1-49.3] and 32.6 [9.4-113.6], respectively) and a greater number of disease progression events (p < 0.001), compared to similar subgroups with low MR-proADM concentrations (< 1.54 nmol/L). Increased out-patient treatment across both cohorts could be facilitated using a derivation-derived MR-proADM cut-off of < 0.87 nmol/L (15.0% and 16.6%), with decreased readmission rates and no mortalities. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the ED with a suspected infection, the blood biomarker MR-proADM could most accurately identify the likelihood of further disease progression. Incorporation into an early sepsis management protocol may therefore aid rapid decision-making in order to either initiate, escalate or intensify early treatment strategies, or identify patients suitable for safe out-patient treatment.

Keywords

Disease progression, Emergency department, MR-proADM, SOFA, Sepsis, qSOFA, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Citation

Saeed, K, Wilson, D C, Bloos, F, Schuetz, P, van der Does, Y, Melander, O, Hausfater, P, Legramante, J M, Claessens, Y-E, Amin, D, Rosenqvist, M, White, G, Mueller, B, Limper, M, Callejo, C C, Brandi, A, Macchi, M-A, Cortes, N, Kutz, A, Patka, P, Yañez, M C, Bernardini, S, Beau, N, Dryden, M, van Gorp, E C M, Minieri, M, Chan, L, Rood, P P M & Del Castillo, J G 2019, 'The early identification of disease progression in patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department : a multi-centre derivation and validation study', Critical care (London, England), vol. 23, no. 1, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2329-5