Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda

Publication date

2024-09

Authors

de Groot, EstherORCID 0000-0003-0388-385XISNI 0000000390236123
der Vossen, Marianne Mak van
Slootweg, Irene
Çorum, Meryem
Kramer, Anneke
Muris, Jean
Scherpbier, Nynke
Thoonen, Bart
Damoiseaux, Roger A.M.J.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-0302ISNI 0000000390478042

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background: Health professions education (HPE) research in the General Practice domain (GP-HPE) is vital for high-quality healthcare. Collaboration among GP-HPE researchers is crucial but challenging. Formulating a research agenda, involving stakeholders, and fostering inter-institutional collaboration can address these challenges and connect educational research and practice. Methods: We used Q-methodology to explore perspectives on GP-HPE research of participants from all Dutch postgraduate GP training institutes. Participants individually sorted statements based on the relevance of future GP-HPE research for educational practice. Data analysis comprised inverted factor analysis, rotation, and qualitative interpretation of configurations of all statements. The National Meeting on Educational Research took a participatory approach. Results: We included 73 participants with diverse involvement in GP-HPE research. We identified five distinct perspectives, each representing a research focus area for developing and innovating GP education: the clinician scientist, the socially engaged GP, the specific GP identity, the GP as an entrepreneur, and the GP engaged in lifelong learning. Discussion: The resulting five perspectives align with General Practice hallmarks. Q-methodology and a participatory approach facilitated collaboration among stakeholders. Successful inter-institutional collaboration requires a common goal, neutral leadership, participant commitment, regular meetings, audit trail support, process transparency, and reflexivity. Future research should address evidence gaps within these perspectives. Conclusion: Using Q-methodology turned out to be valuable for compiling a national research agenda for GP-HPE research. The research process helped to cross boundaries between researchers in different institutions, thus putting inter-institutional collaborative advantage center stage. Our approach could provide a conceivable procedure for HPE researchers worldwide.

Keywords

General Practice, Inter-institutional research collaboration, Q-methodology, Research agenda, Education

Citation

de Groot, E, der Vossen, M M V, Slootweg, I, Çorum, M, Kramer, A, Muris, J, Scherpbier, N, Thoonen, B & Damoiseaux, R 2024, 'Advancing collaboration in health professions education in the general practice domain, developing a national research agenda', Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10340-4