The cost evaluation of day-case compared to inpatient cochlear implantation in adults: subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial

Publication date

2024-08

Authors

Derks, Laura S M
Smit, Adriana LORCID 0000-0001-9126-9969
Thomeer, Hans G X MORCID 0000-0003-0937-6189ISNI 0000000391336468
Grolman, WilkoISNI 0000000393198708
Stokroos, Robert JORCID 0000-0001-8037-2573ISNI 0000000392507919
Wegner, Inge

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the assumption that day-case cochlear implantation is associated with lower costs, compared to inpatient cochlear implantation, while maintaining equal quality of life (QoL) and hearing outcomes, for the Dutch healthcare setting. Study design: A single-center, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary referral center. Methods: Thirty adult patients with post-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for unilateral cochlear implantation surgery were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group (i.e., one night admission). We performed an intention-to-treat evaluation of the difference of the total health care-related costs, hospital and out of hospital costs, between day-case and inpatient cochlear implantation, from a hospital and patient perspective over the course of one year. Audiometric outcomes, assessed using CVC scores, and QoL, assessed using the EQ-5D and HUI3 questionnaires, were taken into account. Results: There were two drop-outs. The total health care-related costs were €41,828 in the inpatient group (n = 14) and €42,710 in the day-case group (n = 14). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.2 days (mean costs of €1,069) in the inpatient group and 0.7 days (mean costs of €701) for the day-case group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital and out of hospital costs. The QoL at 2 months and 1 year postoperative, measured by the EQ-5D index value and HUI3 showed no statistically significant difference. The EQ-5D VAS score measured at 1 year postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the inpatient group (84/100) than in the day-case group (65/100). There were no differences in postoperative complications, objective hearing outcomes, and number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits. Conclusion: A day-case approach to cochlear implant surgery does not result in a statistically significant reduction of health care-related costs compared to an inpatient approach and does not affect the surgical outcome (complications and objective hearing measurements), QoL, and postoperative course (number of postoperative hospital and out of hospital visits). Level of evidence: 1.

Keywords

Cochlear implantation, Cost evaluation, Day-case, Inpatient, Sensorineural hearing loss, Otorhinolaryngology, Journal Article

Citation

Derks, L S M, Smit, A L, Thomeer, H G X M, Grolman, W, Stokroos, R J & Wegner, I 2024, 'The cost evaluation of day-case compared to inpatient cochlear implantation in adults : subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial', European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 281, no. 8, pp. 4009-4019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08501-7