Airborne exposure to wheat allergens: measurement by human immunoglobulin G4 and rabbit immunoglobulin G immunoassays.

Publication date

2006

Authors

Lai, Chen-Li
Wouters, I. M.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-9390ISNI 0000000389429008
Sander, I.
Raulf-Heimsoth, M.
Elms, J.
Rodrigo, M.J.
Heederik, DickISNI 0000000388327640
Doekes, G.ISNI 0000000388937019

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to airborne wheat allergens in the bakery trade is associated with a high risk of occupational allergy and asthma. Control and reduction of allergen exposure require relatively simple but reliable monitoring techniques. We developed new rabbit IgG-based enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for wheat allergens, which might be a convenient alternative for the thus far used human IgG4 inhibition assay. METHODS: The reactivity and specificity of rabbit antibodies were assessed by EIA and immunoblotting, and compared with those of IgE from wheat-sensitized bakers, and with the antibodies used in the IgG4 inhibition EIA. An IgG inhibition and a sandwich EIA were developed for analysis of airborne dust samples. RESULTS: Human IgG4 and rabbit IgG inhibition EIAs had comparable sensitivities, with limits of detection (LOD) between 18 and 88 ng/mL, while the sandwich EIA was much more sensitive (LOD0.95) and their absolute values showed less than 10-20% differences. CONCLUSION: The rabbit IgG EIAs are valid substitutes for the human IgG4 inhibition EIA, with important practical advantages. The inhibition EIA is recommended for routine wheat allergen measurements. The sandwich EIA may be used to measure low allergen levels, as in short task-related exposure measurements or in subfractions of airborne dust samples.

Keywords

Coronacrisis-Taverne

Citation

Bogdanovic, J, Wouters, I M, Sander, I, Raulf-Heimsoth, M, Elms, J, Rodrigo, M J, Heederik, D J J & Doekes, G 2006, 'Airborne exposure to wheat allergens: measurement by human immunoglobulin G4 and rabbit immunoglobulin G immunoassays.', Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1168-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02543.x