Biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus conventional ERCP: Propensity score-matched study and surgeon survey
Publication date
2025-05-14
Authors
Fritzsche, Jeska A
de Jong, Mike J P
Bonsing, Bert A
Busch, Olivier
Daams, Freek
Derksen, Wouter J M
van Driel, Lydi
Festen, Sebastiaan
van Geenen, Erwin-Jan M
Hoogwater, Frederik J H
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Background Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage may lead to complications (16%-24%), potentially hampering surgical exploration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) may reduce drainage-related complications; however, in the absence of surgeon-reported outcomes, it is unknown whether EUS-CDS may hamper surgical exploration. This study assessed the impact of preoperative EUS-CDS on pancreatoduodenectomy. Method Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included in all eight centers performing EUS-CDS in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (Jan 2020-Dec 2022). The primary outcome was major postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included bile leak grade B/C, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C, and overall postoperative complications. A propensity score-matching (1:3) analysis was performed. Surgeons performing pancreatoduodenectomy after EUS-CDS completed a survey on surgical difficulty. Results 937 patients with pancreatoduodenectomy after preoperative biliary drainage were included (42 EUS-CDS, 895 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]). Major postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (19.0%) in the EUS-CDS group and 292 (32.6%) in the ERCP group (relative risk [RR] 0.50; 95%CI 0.23-1.07). No significant differences were observed in overall complications (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.51-1.76), bile leak (RR 1.25; 95%CI 0.31-4.98), or POPF (RR 0.62; 95%CI 0.25-1.56). Results were similar after matching. The survey was completed for 29 pancreatoduodenectomies; surgery was not (13, 45%), slightly (9, 31%), clearly (5,17%), and severely (2, 7%) more complex because of EUS-CDS. Conclusion This early experience suggests that preoperative biliary drainage with EUS-CDS does not increase the rate of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy and only infrequently hampers surgical exploration.
Keywords
Taverne, Gastroenterology, Journal Article
Citation
Fritzsche, J A, de Jong, M J P, Bonsing, B A, Busch, O, Daams, F, Derksen, W J M, van Driel, L, Festen, S, van Geenen, E-J M, Hoogwater, F J H, Inderson, A, Kuiken, S D, Liem, M S L, Lips, D J, Nijkamp, M W, Van Santvoort, H, Siersema, P D, Stommel, M W J, Venneman, N G, Verdonk, R C, Vleggaar, F P, de Wilde, R F, Besselink, M G, van Wanrooij, R L J & Voermans, R P 2025, 'Biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus conventional ERCP : Propensity score-matched study and surgeon survey', Endoscopy, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2543-5672