Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs
Publication date
2019
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This study assessed whether five Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in Europe were more negative about drugs with a Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) that are approved without controlled studies compared to CMA drugs that are approved based on controlled studies. The HTA recommendations were categorized into positive, restricted, and negative. A total of 92 HTA recommendations were available for 27 drugs. Thirty of 62 (48%) and 17 of 30 (57%) of the recommendations were negative for drugs with and without controlled studies, respectively. Overall, only 12 (13%) recommendations were positive. In all jurisdictions, recommendations between drugs with and drugs without controlled data were comparable, which suggests that the presence of controlled data is not decisive in HTA evaluations. The small proportion of unrestricted positive recommendations highlights difficulties with recommending the drugs in this cohort, which may be caused by scientific uncertainty or other factors. Earlier collaboration between stakeholders is advised in order to improve patient access.
Keywords
Citation
Vreman, R A, Bouvy, J C, Bloem, L T, Hövels, A M, Mantel-Teeuwisse, A K, Leufkens, H G M & Goettsch, W G 2019, 'Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies : Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs', Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 684-691. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1251