HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets

Publication date

2007-12

Authors

de Vries, S.J.
van Dijk, A.D.J.
Krzeminski, M.N.ISNI 0000000395774289
van Dijk, M.ISNI 000000039198211X
Thureau, A.J.M.M.
Hsu, V.
Wassenaar, T.A.ISNI 0000000393808422
Bonvin, Alexandre M.J.J.ORCID 0000-0001-7369-1322ISNI 0000000396501354

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Here we present version 2.0 of HADDOCK, which incorporates considerable improvements and new features. HADDOCK is now able to model not only protein-protein complexes but also other kinds of biomolecular complexes and multi-component (N > 2) systems. In the absence of any experimental and/or predicted information to drive the docking, HADDOCK now offers two additional ab initio docking modes based on either random patch definition or center-of-mass restraints. The docking protocol has been considerably improved, supporting among other solvated docking, automatic definition of semi-flexible regions, and inclusion of a desolvation energy term in the scoring scheme. The performance of HADDOCK2.0 is evaluated on the targets of rounds 4-11, run in a semi-automated mode using the original information we used in our CAPRI submissions. This enables a direct assessment of the progress made since the previous versions. Although HADDOCK performed very well in CAPRI (65% and 71% success rates, overall and for unbound targets only, respectively), a substantial improvement was achieved with HADDOCK2.0.

Keywords

Flexible docking, HADDOCK, Multibody docking, Scoring, docking protein, complex formation, conference paper, methodology, priority journal, protein protein interaction, protein targeting, Taverne

Citation

de Vries, S J, van Dijk, A D J, Krzeminski, M N, van Dijk, M, Thureau, A J M M, Hsu, V, Wassenaar, T A & Bonvin, A M J J 2007, 'HADDOCK versus HADDOCK : New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets', Proteins: Structure function and bioinformatics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 726-733. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21723