Balancing risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding with extended anticoagulation: a decision analysis

Abstract

Background: A decision to stop or continue anticoagulation after 3 months of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) should be made by weighing individual risks of recurrence and bleeding. Objectives: To determine the optimal ratio of recurrence risk reduction to increase the risk of bleeding in terms of maximizing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Methods: Using a microsimulation model, outcomes within 5 years were simulated after assigning extended treatment if absolute recurrence risk reduction outweighed absolute increase in clinically relevant bleeding risk (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition), weighted by a certain ratio. Data were simulated based on the Bleeding Risk Study, a prospective cohort including patients after ≥3 months of anticoagulation for unprovoked VTE or provoked VTE with history of VTE. The VTE-PREDICT risk score was used to estimate 5-year risks of recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding. Results: Among 10,000 individuals (mean age, 60.2 years, 36% female), the ratio of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.51-3.40; ie, bleeding is considered 0.90 the severity of recurrent VTE), with 99% of patients assigned extended anticoagulation, was considered optimal and resulted in 93 (95% CI, −23 to 203) additional QALYs compared with the least favorable ratio (5.10, 0% extended anticoagulation). At the optimal ratio, treatment based on VTE-PREDICT yielded 44 (95% CI, −69 to 157) additional QALYs versus standard of care. Conclusion: With the current evidence, the optimal ratio between relevant bleeding risk and absolute recurrence risk reduction remains uncertain. Our results confirm that clinical equipoise exists regarding the decision to stop or continue anticoagulation after initial VTE treatment, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making.