Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework

Publication date

2017-11-02

Authors

Mees, Hannelore
Crabbé, Ann
Driessen, PeterORCID 0000-0002-0724-6666ISNI 0000000140953103

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

ABSTRACTAcross Europe, there is an increasing trend towards citizen involvement in the implementation of flood risk governance. Policy-makers increasingly advocate co-produced flood risk governance (FRG), whereby citizens are actively engaged in the implementation of flood risk policy, for example, by taking property-level protection measures. In doing so, they aim to make FRG more resilient, efficient and legitimate [Mees, H., Crabbé, A., Alexander, M., Kaufmann, M., Bruzzone, L., Levy, L., & Lewandowski, J. (2016a). Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: Insights from cross-country comparison in Europe. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08500-210307]. Co-production, however, also raises important questions concerning these aims. In this paper, the opportunities and limitations of and barriers to citizen co-production in FRG in terms of resilience, efficiency and legitimacy are investigated by an extensive review of literature on citizen co-production in other public services and on individual and community-based climate change adaptation and FRG. Based on this, a tentative framework is developed on the required conditions to enable co-produced FRG, which benefits both the resilience, efficiency and legitimacy of FRG.

Keywords

Flood risk governance, citizen co-production, resilience, legitimacy, responsibility distribution, Taverne, SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Mees, H, Crabbé, A & Driessen, P P J 2017, 'Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework', Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 827-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1299623