Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored anti-EGFR therapy selection in patients with colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice

Publication date

2022-10

Authors

Steeghs, Elisabeth M.P.
Vink, Geraldine R
Elferink, Marloes A.G.
Voorham, Quirinus J.M.
Gelderblom, Hans
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
Grünberg, Katrien
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L.
PATH Consortium Members

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

For a nationwide real-word data study on the application of predictive mutation testing of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy stratification, pathology data were collected from the Dutch Pathology Registry from October 2017 until June 2019 (N=4060) and linked with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mutation testing rates increased from 24% at diagnosis of stage IV disease to 60% after 20–23 months of follow-up (p<0.001). Application of anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS/ NRAS wild-type patients was mainly observed from the third treatment line onwards (65% vs 17% in first/ second treatment line (p<0.001)). The national average KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation rate was 63.9%, being similar for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches and single gene tests (64.4% vs 61.2%, p=ns). NGS-based approaches detected more additional potential biomarkers, for example, ERBB2 amplifications (p<0.05). Therefore, single gene tests are suitable to stratify patients with mCRC for anti-EGFR therapy, but NGS is superior enabling upfront identification of therapy resistance or facilitate enrolment into clinical trials.

Keywords

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Citation

Steeghs, E M P, Vink, G R, Elferink, M A G, Voorham, Q J M, Gelderblom, H, Nagtegaal, I D, Grünberg, K, Ligtenberg, M J L & PATH Consortium Members 2022, 'Nationwide evaluation of mutation-tailored anti-EGFR therapy selection in patients with colorectal cancer in daily clinical practice', Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 706-711. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207865