Comparative life cycle assessments of stand-alone and integrated green hydrogen and biofuel value chains: A case study on drop-in biocrude, biohydrogen and biomethanol production systems
Publication date
2025-10
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Biofuel production systems integration with green hydrogen (e.g., from proton exchange membrane electrolysers- PEM) can enable product yield improvements (e.g., gasification based biomethanol via hydrogenation of carbon-oxides) or co-production of synthetic methanol through hydrogenation of captured CO2. Environmental impact of these integrations compared to stand-alone systems is unknown. This study evaluates and compares the environmental performance of wood chip-based biofuel production systems, including advanced biocrude fuel (ABF), biomethanol (BMeOH), and biohydrogen (BH2), in stand-alone and integrated configurations with PEM-based hydrogen. The approach involved consequential life cycle analysis, focused on cradle-to-gate global warming potential (GWP), terrestrial acidification (TA), freshwater eutrophication (FE), and land use (LU) impacts. Gasification-based biomethanol yield enhancement with PEM hydrogen shows specific environmental benefits (e.g., in TA) while synthetic methanol co-production with ABF negatively impacts overall environmental performance. High electricity demand of PEM, influenced by the marginal electricity-mix, contributes to these trends. For biohydrogen, two-stage gasification route is preferable over pyrolysis-gasification due to higher biochar yield, which provide credit for replacing pulverized coal. Among the investigated systems, the stand-alone gasification-based biomethanol is the most environmentally efficient pathway for utilizing limited biomass. Meanwhile, the stand-alone two-stage gasification-based biohydrogen and stand-alone ABF show promise for decarbonizing hydrogen and diesel economies, respectively. All the biofuel systems outperform fossil fuels in GWP but lag in other categories (ABF- FE/LU, BMeOH- TA/FE/LU & BH2- TA/LU). The study emphasizes the importance of less resource-intensive green electricity supply and electrified logistics (e.g., biomass transport via freight trains) in enhancing the environmental performance of biofuel production systems.
Keywords
Biohydrogen, Biomethanol, Drop-in biocrude, Green hydrogen, LCA, Synthetic fuels, Forestry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Agronomy and Crop Science, Waste Management and Disposal, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, SDG 15 - Life on Land
Citation
Padi, R K, González, V, Maran, K, Martinez, A, Brandão, M, Sánchez, E & Junginger, M 2025, 'Comparative life cycle assessments of stand-alone and integrated green hydrogen and biofuel value chains : A case study on drop-in biocrude, biohydrogen and biomethanol production systems', Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 201, 108138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108138