Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap
Publication date
2021-08
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
No license information available
Abstract
Rapid advances in AI-based automation have led to a number of existential and economic concerns. In particular, as automating technologies develop enhanced competency, they seem to threaten the values associated with meaningful work. In this article, we focus on one such value: the value of achievement. We argue that achievement is a key part of what makes work meaningful and that advances in AI and automation give rise to a number achievement gaps in the workplace. This could limit people’s ability to participate in meaningful forms of work. Achievement gaps are interesting, in part, because they are the inverse of the (negative) responsibility gaps already widely discussed in the literature on AI ethics. Having described and explained the problem of achievement gaps, the article concludes by identifying four possible policy responses to the problem.
Keywords
Automation, Achievement, Meaningful work, Artifcial intelligence, Responsibility gap, Autonomy, Mastery, Community
Citation
Danaher, J & Nyholm, S 2021, 'Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap', AI and Ethics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00028-x