How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking

Publication date

2025

Authors

van der Wel, KeesISNI 0000000512641996
van de Mortel, Marit
van de Grift, LiesbethISNI 0000000119433672
Akerboom, SanneORCID 0000-0003-0001-7753ISNI 0000000492183835

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Stakeholder participation has become a popular tool in environmental policy-making. Such participation holds the promise of fostering the legitimacy of policies and thus reducing the costs of enforcement. Legitimacy can be – and often has been – assessed from a normative tradition, by means of a fixed set of procedural or substantive criteria. From the sociological tradition, legitimacy and stakeholder participation are considered a social construct, in which it is recognized that legitimacy is not intrinsic to the process or output of participation, but instead relies on stakeholders’ perceptions of both, which is also informed by past processes and experiences. We propose a novel way of understanding and assessing environmental groups’ perceptions of legitimacy and illegitimacy, combining insights and theories from political science and history, and we apply this approach to two policy-making processes: the Dutch Climate Agreement and the Integrated Approach to Nitrogen. We found that past processes and experiences influence the perception of legitimacy in current processes. Moreover, we uncovered new participation needs that positively contribute to the perception of legitimacy and that do not yet fit within the more classic normative tradition.

Keywords

NGO participation, Public participation, climate and environment, legitimacy, policy-making, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

van der Wel, K, van de Mortel, M, van de Grift, L & Akerboom, S 2025, 'How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking', Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2024.2443392