Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study

Publication date

2025-11

Authors

Karpinski, Madeleine J
Rahbar, Kambiz
Bögemann, Martin
Nikoukar, Laya Rahbar
Schäfers, Michael
Hoberück, Sebastian
Miederer, Matthias
Hölscher, Tobias
Rasul, Sazan
Miszczyk, Marcin

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background and objective: We established prognostic nomograms incorporating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters standardised by Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE; PPP1). Here, we develop an updated PPP2 risk score from a large international multicentre registry study. Methods: We included 6128 prostate cancer patients who underwent PSMA-PET at 20 hospitals in Europe, USA, and Australia between 2013 and 2022. Investigator sites were split 2:1 into the development (4044 patients) and validation (2084 patients) cohorts. We created nomograms of version 2 (PPP2) based on Cox regression models with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty for overall survival (development cohort). Performance of both nomograms was measured using Harrell's C-index and calibration plots and a head-to-head comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score by receiver operating characteristic curves (validation cohort). Key findings and limitations: Predictors were distant metastases (extrapelvic nodal metastases [M1a], bone metastases [M1b], and visceral metastases [M1c]), PSMA expression score, and total lesion count (visual PPP2) or total tumour volume (quantitative PPP2). C-indices (95% confidence interval) in the validation cohort were 0.80 (0.78–0.82; visual) and 0.80 (0.79–0.82; quantitative), respectively. Accuracy of both the PPP2 nomograms was superior to the NCCN risk score (n = 1034, area under the curve 0.84 vs 0.76; p < 0.001). The retrospective design represents a limitation of the study. Conclusions and clinical implications: PPP nomograms were improved in an international multicentre study to predict accurately the 3- and 5-yr overall survival probabilities of prostate cancer. PPP2 yielded superior accuracy to the NCCN risk score. A free software tool has been created for PROMISE and PPP2 assessments (promise-pet.org).

Keywords

Overall survival, Prognosis, Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation nomogram, Prostate cancer, Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography, Urology

Citation

Karpinski, M J, Rahbar, K, Bögemann, M, Nikoukar, L R, Schäfers, M, Hoberück, S, Miederer, M, Hölscher, T, Rasul, S, Miszczyk, M, Lanfranchi, F, Bauckneht, M, Pfob, C H, Kind, F, Goffin, K, Hüsing, A, Kesch, C, Herrmann, K, Stuschke, M, Gafita, A, Hüsing, J, Calais, J, Hofman, M S, Hope, T A, Miksch, J, Soeterik, T F W, Di Giorgio, A, Farolfi, A, Bjartell, A, Trägårdh, E, Unterrainer, L M, Holzgreve, A, Sheikh, G T, Rauscher, I, Eiber, M, Hadaschik, B A & Fendler, W P 2025, 'Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2) : Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study', European Urology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.04.017