Comparison of six electronic healthcare databases in Europe using standardized protocols: A descriptive study on the incidence of cancer
Files
Publication date
2013-10
Authors
Afonso, Ana S.
de Groot, M.C.H.
Van Den Ham, Rianne
Bruin, Marie L.
Alvarez, Consuelo Huerta
Gil, Miguel
Hesse, Ulrik
Rønn, Pernille F.
Souverein, Patrick C.
Alvarez, Yolanda
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Abstract
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Background: There are several national cancer registries available across Europe, but information on cancer incidence from routine electronic healthcare record (EHR) databases (DBs), such as General Practitioners (GPs) and comparisons across different databases are rather scarce. It is important to compare this information, and also benchmark this against national registries in order to assess its usefulness for pharmacoepidemiological studies on cancer. Objectives: To investigate sources of variation in the incidence of Cancer across routine EHR DBs in Europe, using a standardized methodology. Methods: We used six EHR DBs from Spain-ES (BIFAP), the United Kingdom-UK (THIN and CPRD), the Netherlands-NL (Mondriaan: AHC and NPCRD), and Denmark-DK (National registrations of patients- NRP). Cancer incidences were calculated for the whole population between 2003 and 2008 and were stratified by sex, age and type of cancer (breast, prostate and colon). Overall incidence rates were age and sex standardized to the European 2008 reference population. Results: The initially observed variation in cancer incidence decreased after standardization and ranged for any cancer from 25.2/10,000 in the NL (NPCRD) in 2004, to 71.5/10,000 in the DK (NRP) in 2008. The incidence of cancer increased in DK and doubled in NPCRD between 2003 and 2008, but decreased in BIFAP and THIN. Cancer incidence was higher for women in all DBs, except for BIFAP and AHC. In 2008, the incidence of breast cancer was the highest in the NPCRD (37.6/10,000) and the lowest in BIFAP (9.1/ 10,000), while the incidence of prostate cancer was the highest in DK (15.9/10,000). No major differences were observed between countries regarding colon cancer. Conclusions: The incidence of cancer as measured in six routine EHR DBs differed between the four European countries using a standard methodology, despite the convergence seen after standardization for age and sex. Overall cancer incidence increased over time for most of the European countries, except for Spain. From our analysis we can infer that incidences are in line with the European cancer registries available.
Keywords
electronic medical record, Europe, neoplasm, pharmacoepidemiology, risk management, cancer incidence, human, male, methodology, Spain, United Kingdom, data base, population, standardization, cancer registry, general practitioner, colon cancer, patient, prostate cancer, breast, prostate, female, registration, Denmark, Netherlands, health care, breast cancer, incidence, binocular convergence, register, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Afonso, A S, De Groot, M C H, Van Den Ham, R, Bruin, M L, Alvarez, C H, Gil, M, Hesse, U, Rønn, P F, Souverein, P C, Alvarez, Y, Slattery, J, Rottenkolber, M, Van Dijk, L, Schlienger, R G, Reynolds, R, Klungel, O H & Grimaldi-Bensouda, L 2013, 'Comparison of six electronic healthcare databases in Europe using standardized protocols: A descriptive study on the incidence of cancer', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 22, no. s1, 576, pp. 285. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3512