Diversity ideologies and intergroup attitudes: When multiculturalism is beneficial for majority group members

Publication date

2018-02-01

Authors

Ng Tseung-Wong, Caroline
Verkuyten, MaykelORCID 0000-0003-0137-1527ISNI 0000000114807698

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

In social psychology, the background assumption of most of the research on cultural diversity ideologies is that multiculturalism is not in the interest of majority group members while colourblindness is. However, this assumption may not hold in a context in which multiculturalism benefits the majority group. Two studies investigated the association between multiculturalism and in-group bias amongst Hindu majority members in Mauritius. In Study 1, survey data showed that those who highly identified as Hindus reported less bias when they endorsed multiculturalism. Using an experimental design, Study 2 demonstrated that higher compared to lower majority group identifiers showed stronger in-group bias in colourblindness, polyculturalism, and control conditions, but not in a multiculturalism condition. In contrast to the existing research conducted in Western countries, these findings demonstrate that multiculturalism rather than colourblindness can be reassuring for high majority group identifiers. It is concluded that the meaning and impact of cultural diversity ideologies for intergroup relations depend on the national context.

Keywords

diversity ideologies, ethnic identification, in-group bias, majority group, Taverne, Social Psychology, Cultural Studies, Communication, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Sociology and Political Science

Citation

Ng Tseung-Wong, C & Verkuyten, M 2018, 'Diversity ideologies and intergroup attitudes : When multiculturalism is beneficial for majority group members', Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663021