Embodied design versus dynamic visualization: Benefits for a far transfer problem solving in trigonometry.
Files
Publication date
2021-06
Editors
de Vries, E.
Hod, Y.
Ahn, J.
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
The development of digital technologies enables visualizations of many scientific relations. In this paper, we question the efficiency of the visualizing tools from a theoretical perspective that combines cultural-historical and radical embodied approaches. Dynamic visualizations expose the target relations in a ready-made form, while embodied action-based design provides students with an opportunity to reinvent the target relations in their sensory-motor coordinations. In a multiple-case study, we compare these design genres for learning trigonometric relations. While dynamic visualizations were more efficient in simple tasks, embodied action-based design enhanced students' reasoning in a far transfer task.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Shvarts, A & van Helden, G 2021, Embodied design versus dynamic visualization: Benefits for a far transfer problem solving in trigonometry. in E de Vries, Y Hod & J Ahn (eds), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021.. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bochum, Germany, pp. 717-720. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2021.717