Embodied design versus dynamic visualization: Benefits for a far transfer problem solving in trigonometry.

Publication date

2021-06

Authors

Shvarts, A. Y.ISNI 0000000492921279
van Helden, G.ISNI 0000000527818467

Editors

de Vries, E.
Hod, Y.
Ahn, J.

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

The development of digital technologies enables visualizations of many scientific relations. In this paper, we question the efficiency of the visualizing tools from a theoretical perspective that combines cultural-historical and radical embodied approaches. Dynamic visualizations expose the target relations in a ready-made form, while embodied action-based design provides students with an opportunity to reinvent the target relations in their sensory-motor coordinations. In a multiple-case study, we compare these design genres for learning trigonometric relations. While dynamic visualizations were more efficient in simple tasks, embodied action-based design enhanced students' reasoning in a far transfer task.

Keywords

Taverne

Citation

Shvarts, A & van Helden, G 2021, Embodied design versus dynamic visualization: Benefits for a far transfer problem solving in trigonometry. in E de Vries, Y Hod & J Ahn (eds), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021.. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bochum, Germany, pp. 717-720. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2021.717