Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Comparative Study of Low- and High-Volume Hospitals

Publication date

2025

Authors

Makineli, Seher
Gernaat, Sofie A MORCID 0000-0001-7828-1138
Richir, Milan C.
Veldhuis, WBORCID 0000-0002-9798-6843ISNI 0000000395578034
Veenendaal, Liesbeth M
Moman, Maaike RISNI 0000000395007936
Ferdinandus, Patrick I
Vriens, Menno RISNI 0000000396256002
van Diest, Paul JORCID 0000-0003-0658-2745ISNI 000000004213151X
Maarse, Wies

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Purpose: Positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are an important risk factor for local tumor recurrence and the need for re-excision in women with breast cancer. It remains unclearwhich factors collectively influence positivemargins after BCS and whether the outcomes vary among hospitals. This study investigated the occurrence and risk factors of positive margins after BCS in women with breast cancer in two Dutch hospitals. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from medical records of women who were diagnosed with newly invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ and underwent primary BCS between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 in two Dutch hospitals. Results: A total of 423 cases (410 patients) were included, with a median age of 58 years (interquartile range 51-66). On average, the positivemargin rate after BCS was 8.0%, which was significantly higher in the low-volume hospital (14.9%) than in the high-volume hospital (5.9%). Invasive lobular carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] = 4.97, confidence interval [CI] = 1.91-12.94), postoperative tumor size (OR = 1.07, CI = 1.03-1.11), low hospital volume (OR = 3.90, CI = 1.58-9.66), and lumpectomy size (OR = 0.97, CI = 0.94-1.00) were significantly associated with positive margins after BCS. Conclusion: Positive margin rate after BCS was low, with 8.0% among all cases and varied significantly between the hospitals. Patient-, tumor-, radiological-, and surgery-related factors may contribute to these variations. An optimized collaborative multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer care, particularly between radiologists and surgeons, should be strived to achieve improved oncological outcomes in women after BCS.

Keywords

Breast cancer, Breast-conserving surgery, Oncoplastic surgery, Radical resection, Surgical margin status, Surgery, Oncology

Citation

Makineli, S, Gernaat, S A M, Richir, M C, Veldhuis, W B, Veenendaal, L M, Moman, M R, Ferdinandus, P I, Vriens, M R, Van Diest, P J, Maarse, W & Witkamp, A J 2025, 'Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery : A Comparative Study of Low- and High-Volume Hospitals', Breast Care, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1159/000544904