Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Publication date
2023-06
Authors
Grashuis, Pepijn
Khargi, SDM
Veen, K
El Ousrouti, A
Bemelmans-Lalezari, Shirin
Cornette, JMJ
Roos-Hesselink, JW
Takkenberg, JJM
Mokhles, Mostafa M
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the ongoing debate concerning the choice of valve prosthesis for women requiring mitral valve replacement (MVR) and who wish to conceive. Bioprostheses are associated with risk of early structural valve deterioration. Mechanical prostheses require lifelong anticoagulation and carry maternal and fetal risks. Also, the optimal anticoagulation regimen during pregnancy after MVR remains unclear. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of studies reporting on pregnancy after MVR. Valve- and anticoagulation-related maternal and fetal risks during pregnancy and 30 days' postpartum were analyzed. Results: Fifteen studies reporting 722 pregnancies were included. In total, 87.2% of pregnant women had a mechanical prosthesis and 12.5% a bioprosthesis. Maternal mortality risk was 1.33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-2.56), any hemorrhage risk 6.90% (95% CI, 3.70-12.88). Valve thrombosis risk was 4.71% (95% CI, 3.06-7.26) in patients with mechanical prostheses. 3.23% (95% CI, 1.34-7.75) of the patients with bioprostheses experienced early structural valve deterioration. Of these, the mortality was 40%. Pregnancy loss risk was 29.29% (95% CI, 19.74-43.47) with mechanical prostheses versus 13.50% (95% CI, 4.31-42.30) for bioprostheses. Switching to heparin during the first trimester demonstrated a bleeding risk of 7.78% (95% CI, 3.71-16.31) versus 4.08% (95% CI, 1.17-14.28) for women on oral anticoagulants throughout pregnancy and a valve thrombosis risk of 6.99% (95% CI, 2.08-23.51) versus 2.89% (95% CI, 1.40-5.94). Administration of anticoagulant dosages greater than 5 mg resulted in a risk of fetal adverse events of 74.24% (95% CI, 56.11-98.23) versus 8.85% (95% CI, 2.70-28.99) in ≤5 mg. Conclusions: A bioprosthesis seems the best option for women of childbearing age who are interested in future pregnancy after MVR. If mechanical valve replacement is preferred, the favorable anticoagulation regimen is continuous low-dose oral anticoagulants. Shared decision-making remains priority when choosing a prosthetic valve for young women.
Keywords
bioprosthesis, mechanical valve, mitral valve replacement, oral anticoagulant, pregnancy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Journal Article
Citation
Grashuis, P, Khargi, SDM, Veen, K, El Ousrouti, A, Bemelmans-Lalezari, S, Cornette, JMJ, Roos-Hesselink, JW, Takkenberg, JJM & Mokhles, M 2023, 'Pregnancy outcomes in women with a mitral valve prosthesis : A systematic review and meta-analysis', Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 14, pp. 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.001