Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States
Publication date
2021-06
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
In the wake of the withdrawal of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug rofecoxib, regulators worldwide reconsidered their approach to postmarket safety. Many have since adopted a “life cycle” approach to regulation of medicines, facilitating faster approval of new medicines while planning for potential postmarket safety issues. A crucial aspect of postmarket safety is the effective and timely communication of emerging risk information using postmarket safety advisories, commonly issued as letters to healthcare professionals, drug safety bulletins, media alerts, and website announcements. Yet regulators differ in their use of postmarket safety advisories. We examined the capacity of regulators in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia to warn about postmarket safety issues through safety advisories by assessing their governance, legislative authority, risk communication capabilities, and transparency.
Keywords
Taverne, Pharmacology, Pharmacology (medical), SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Bhasale, A L, Sarpatwari, A, De Bruin, M L, Lexchin, J, Lopert, R, Bahri, P & Mintzes, B J 2021, 'Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health : A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States', Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1424-1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2010