Examining Dutch children's vocabularies across infancy and toddlerhood: Demographic effects are age-specific and task-specific

Publication date

2025-05

Authors

van der Klis, AnikaORCID 0000-0001-5807-0667ISNI 0000000512624707
Junge, C.M.M.ORCID 0000-0001-9876-8058ISNI 0000000393995491
Adriaans, F.W.ISNI 0000000392618088
Kager, RenéORCID 0000-0002-5811-839XISNI 0000000110640747

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Limited studies have examined demographic differences in children’s vocabulary in longitudinal samples, while there are questions regarding the duration, direction, and magnitude of these effects across development. In this longitudinal study, we included over 400 Dutch children. Caregivers filled out N-CDIs when children were 9–11 months (measuring word comprehension, word production, and gestures) and around 2–5 years of age (measuring word production). At 2–5 years, we also administered a receptive vocabulary task in the lab. We examined demographic effects on vocabulary size across infancy and toddlerhood. We found a disadvantage for males in infants’ gestures and toddlers’ vocabulary production. We found a negative effect of maternal education on infants’ caregiver-reported vocabulary, but a positive effect on toddlers’ lab-administered receptive vocabulary. Lastly, we found a negative effect of multilingualism – but only for the lab-administered task. Examining predictors in large, longitudinal samples ensures their robustness and generalisability across development.

Keywords

YOUth Cohort Study, caregiver reports, demographic effects, language assessment, vocabulary development, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, General Psychology

Citation

van der Klis, A, Junge, C, Adriaans, F & Kager, R 2025, 'Examining Dutch children's vocabularies across infancy and toddlerhood : Demographic effects are age-specific and task-specific', Journal of Child Language, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 709-728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000199