Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging for rectal cancer response assessment after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation

Publication date

2015-06

Authors

Intven, Martijn PwORCID 0000-0002-5068-5517ISNI 0000000393019546
Reerink, O.ISNI 0000000393077738
Philippens, Mariëlle E PORCID 0000-0003-0205-3459ISNI 0000000387302804

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for organ sparing treatment after good response to neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is challenging as no optimal restaging modality is available after CRT. In this study, we assessed the value of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for rectal cancer pathological response prediction. METHODS: In 51 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, the tumor volume and volume transfer constant (Ktrans) were obtained at 3 Tesla before CRT and surgery. The predictive potential for pathological complete response (pCR) and good response (GR) was assessed. GR was defined as pCR and near-pCR based on the tumor regression grade. RESULTS: The GR group consisted of 10 patients (19.6%) with six pCR (11.8%). Both the post-CRT tumor volume and post-CRT Ktrans values and the relative change in volume (ΔVolume) and Ktrans (ΔKtrans) were predictive for pathological response. ΔKtrans showed the best predictive potential with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for GR using a cutoff value of 32% reduction in Ktrans. For pCR the best PPV was 80% with a multiparameter model containing ΔVolume and ΔKtrans. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI has predictive potential for pathological response after CRT in rectal cancer with the relative ΔKtrans being the most predictive parameter.

Keywords

Taverne, Journal Article

Citation

Intven, M, Reerink, O & Philippens, M E P 2015, 'Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging for rectal cancer response assessment after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation', Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1646-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24718