Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled

Publication date

2016-03-01

Authors

Rogelj, Joeri
Schaeffer, MichielORCID 0000-0003-0052-5088ISNI 0000000392561616
Friedlingstein, Pierre
Gillett, Nathan P.
van Vuuren, DetlefORCID 0000-0003-0398-2831ISNI 0000000040910093
Riahi, Keywan
Allen, Myles
Knutti, Reto

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Several methods exist to estimate the cumulative carbon emissions that would keep global warming to below a given temperature limit. Here we review estimates reported by the IPCC and the recent literature, and discuss the reasons underlying their differences. The most scientifically robust number-the carbon budget for CO2 -induced warming only-is also the least relevant for real-world policy. Including all greenhouse gases and using methods based on scenarios that avoid instead of exceed a given temperature limit results in lower carbon budgets. For a >66% chance of limiting warming below the internationally agreed temperature limit of 2 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, the most appropriate carbon budget estimate is 590-1,240 GtCO2 from 2015 onwards. Variations within this range depend on the probability of staying below 2 °C and on end-of-century non-CO2 warming. Current CO2 emissions are about 40 GtCO2 yr -1, and global CO2 emissions thus have to be reduced urgently to keep within a 2 °C-compatible budget.

Keywords

Taverne, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), Social Sciences (miscellaneous), SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Citation

Rogelj, J, Schaeffer, M, Friedlingstein, P, Gillett, N P, Van Vuuren, D P, Riahi, K, Allen, M & Knutti, R 2016, 'Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled', Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868