Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled
Publication date
2016-03-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Several methods exist to estimate the cumulative carbon emissions that would keep global warming to below a given temperature limit. Here we review estimates reported by the IPCC and the recent literature, and discuss the reasons underlying their differences. The most scientifically robust number-the carbon budget for CO2 -induced warming only-is also the least relevant for real-world policy. Including all greenhouse gases and using methods based on scenarios that avoid instead of exceed a given temperature limit results in lower carbon budgets. For a >66% chance of limiting warming below the internationally agreed temperature limit of 2 °C relative to pre-industrial levels, the most appropriate carbon budget estimate is 590-1,240 GtCO2 from 2015 onwards. Variations within this range depend on the probability of staying below 2 °C and on end-of-century non-CO2 warming. Current CO2 emissions are about 40 GtCO2 yr -1, and global CO2 emissions thus have to be reduced urgently to keep within a 2 °C-compatible budget.
Keywords
Taverne, Environmental Science (miscellaneous), Social Sciences (miscellaneous), SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Citation
Rogelj, J, Schaeffer, M, Friedlingstein, P, Gillett, N P, Van Vuuren, D P, Riahi, K, Allen, M & Knutti, R 2016, 'Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled', Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868