Stimulating autonomous motivation in the classroom: The role of interpersonal teacher agency and communion
Files
Publication date
2014
Editors
Zandvliet, David
den Brok, Perry
Mainhard, Tim
van Tartwijk, Jan
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Self Determination Theory (SDT) distinguishes the quality of motivation from its quantity or intensity (Vansteenkiste, Sierens, Soetens, Luyckx, & Lens, 2009). A sequence from controlled to autonomous motivation is adopted; autonomous motivation is seen as the best quality type. Being autonomously motivated, as opposed to controlled, has been found to lead to more volitional persistence, better relationships in social groups, more effective performance, greater health and wellbeing (Deci & Ryan, 2002), deep-level cognitive processing (Vansteenkiste et al., 2009), and creativity (Ryan & Deci, 2000a). The extent to which students’ motivation is controlled or autonomous, describes a difference in the quality of motivation.
Keywords
Citation
Wijsman, L, Mainhard, T & Brekelmans, M 2014, Stimulating autonomous motivation in the classroom: The role of interpersonal teacher agency and communion. in D Zandvliet, P den Brok, T Mainhard & J van Tartwijk (eds), Interpersonal relationships in education: From theory to practice . Advances in Learning Environments Research, vol. 5, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-701-8_14