What is a clinically relevant improvement on an 11-point single-item rating scale?

Publication date

2025-04-09

Authors

Išerić, Emina
Hendriksen, Pauline A
Dijkgraaf, Dana M
Kiani, Pantea
Verster, J.C.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-2096ISNI 0000000076939752

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Single item rating scales, ranging from 0 to 10, are widely utilized in research and clinical practice to provide quick, reliable assessments of constructs such as mood, quality of life, and immune fitness. These scales offer several practical advantages, including ease of administration, reduced patient burden, and straightforward interpretability. This expert opinion explores the distinction between statistical significance and clinical relevance on 11-point single-item scales, with a focus on immune fitness, i.e. the body’s capacity to mount an appropriate immune response to health challenges. Drawing on existing literature, including studies in pain and dietary interventions, it is proposed that a minimum difference of 1.5 points on the single-item immune fitness scale may represent a clinically relevant improvement. Nevertheless, the interpretation of changes on single-item scales depends on the concept being evaluated, its impact on daily life, and the absolute scores reported.

Keywords

Single-item assessment, clinical relevance, statistical significance, immune fitness, mood, quality of life

Citation

Išerić, E, Hendriksen, P A, Dijkgraaf, D M, Kiani, P & Verster, J 2025, 'What is a clinically relevant improvement on an 11-point single-item rating scale?', American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63-68. https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.65