TriGuard™ HDH embolic deflection device for cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Publication date

2017-02-15

Authors

Samim, Mariam
van der Worp, H. BartISNI 0000000396856702
Agostoni, PiefrancescoISNI 0000000388177910
Hendrikse, JeroenISNI 0000000390964171
Budde, Ricardo P. J.ISNI 0000000392898112
Nijhoff, Freek
Ramjankhan, F. Z.ISNI 0000000395925702
Doevendans, PieterISNI 0000000110574516
Stella, Pieter R.ISNI 0000000393574363

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the safety and performance of the new embolic deflection device TriGuard™HDH in patients undergoing TAVR. Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with a high incidence of new cerebral ischemic lesions. The use of an embolic protection device may reduce the frequency of TAVR-related embolic events. Methods: This prospective, single arm feasibility pilot study included 14 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis scheduled for TAVR. Cerebral diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) was planned in all patients one day before and at day 4 (±2) after the procedure. Major adverse cerebral and cardiac events (MACCEs) were recorded for all patients. Primary endpoints of this study were I) device performance success defined as coverage of the aortic arch takeoffs throughout the entire TAVR procedure and II) MACCE occurrence. Secondary endpoints included the number and the volume of new cerebral ischemic lesions on DWI. Results: Thirteen patients underwent transfemoral TAVR and one patient a transapical procedure. Edwards SAPIEN valve prosthesis was implanted in 8 (57%) patients and Medtronic CoreValve prosthesis in the remaining 6 (43%). Predefined performance success of the TriGuard™HDH device was achieved in 9 (64%) patients. The composite endpoint MACCE occurred in none of the patients. Post-procedural DWI was performed in 11 patients. Comparing the DWI of these patients to a historical control group showed no reduction in number [median 5.5 vs. 5.0, P=0.857], however there was a significant reduction in mean lesion volume per patient [median 13.8 vs. 25.1, P=0.049]. Conclusion: This study showed the feasibility and safety of using the TriGuard™HDH for cerebral protection during TAVR. This device did not decrease the number of post-procedural new cerebral DWI lesions, however its use showed decreased lesion volume as compared to unprotected TAVR.

Keywords

Aortic valve stenosis, Cerebral embolic protection device, Cerebral ischemic injury, Intracranial embolism, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, TriGuard embolic deflector system, Taverne, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Clinical Trial, Journal Article

Citation

Samim, M, van der Worp, B, Agostoni, P, Hendrikse, J, Budde, R P J, Nijhoff, F, Ramjankhan, F, Doevendans, P A & Stella, P R 2017, 'TriGuard ™ HDH embolic deflection device for cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 470-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26566