HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: "Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt"

Publication date

2010-02-01

Authors

Kleinhans, MaartenORCID 0000-0002-9484-1673ISNI 0000000114640007
Bierkens, MarcORCID 0000-0002-7411-6562ISNI 0000000109834798
van der Perk, MarcelORCID 0000-0002-7968-661XISNI 0000000116493004

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

From an outsider's perspective, hydrology combines field work with modelling, but mostly ignores the potential for gaining understanding and conceiving new hypotheses from controlled laboratory experiments. Sivapalan (2009) pleaded for a question- and hypothesis-driven hydrology where data analysis and top-down modelling approaches lead to general explanations and understanding of general trends and patterns. We discuss why and how such understanding is gained very effectively from controlled experimentation in comparison to field work and modelling. We argue that many major issues in hydrology are open to experimental investigations. Though experiments may have scale problems, these are of similar gravity as the well-known problems of fieldwork and modelling and have not impeded spectacular progress through experimentation in other geosciences.

Keywords

Citation

Kleinhans, M G, Bierkens, M F P & van der Perk, M 2010, 'HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: "Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt"', Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 369-382. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-369-2010