Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions

Publication date

2014-01-01

Authors

Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues, JoaoISNI 0000000387692013
Bonvin, Alexandre M J JORCID 0000-0001-7369-1322ISNI 0000000396501354

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Protein interactions define the homeostatic state of the cell. Our ability to understand these interactions and their role in both health and disease is tied to our knowledge of the 3D atomic structure of the interacting partners and their complexes. Despite advances in experimental method of structure determination, the majority of known protein interactions are still missing an atomic structure. High-resolution methods such as X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy struggle with the high-throughput demand, while low-resolution techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy or small-angle X-ray scattering provide data that are too coarse. Computational structure prediction of protein complexes, or docking, was first developed to complement experimental research and has since blossomed into an independent and lively field of research. Its most successful products are hybrid approaches that combine powerful algorithms with experimental data from various sources to generate high-resolution models of protein complexes. This minireview introduces the concept of docking and docking with the help of experimental data, compares and contrasts the available integrative docking methods, and provides a guide for the experimental researcher for what types of data and which particular software can be used to model a protein complex.

Keywords

3D structure, complexes, data-driven docking, integrative modeling, interface prediction, protein docking, protein interactions, restraints, sampling, scoring, Taverne, Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology

Citation

Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues, J & Bonvin, A M J J 2014, 'Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions', The FEBS journal, vol. 281, no. 8, pp. 1988-2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12771